The Secret to a Good Business Name

Source: The Secret to a Good Business Name

Functional and descriptive names like Subway and Martha Stewart work when the point is to direct attention to the company brand. They’re not as effective when all they do is explain what the company does. Consider the blandness of these (real) companies: ABC Name Bank, Name Generator, Naming, The Naming Company, Strategic Name Development … and so on and so forth.

Invented names like Oreo, Kleenex and Google are great because they’re memorable and fun to say. Less interesting are names built upon Greek and Latin roots, like Acquient or Agilent. These may be easier to push through the trademark process and come off sounding official, but you better have an advertising budget big enough to explain what it is you actually do.

Experiential names like Infoseek and Magellan play off the experience of using a product or service and make sense to the consumer. But on the flipside, they’re used so often the impact is dulled. For example, Explorer and Safari are browsers–and SUVs.

Evocative names are usually the most successful (Yahoo and Apple), but also the hardest to get right (apparently companies with failed evocative names all disappear).

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s